We define a research gap as a topic or area for which missing or inadequate information limits the ability of reviewers to reach a conclusion for a given question. A research gap may be further developed, such as through stakeholder engagement in prioritization, into research needs. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK126702/)
- How should novelty be valued in science?
- Articulating Novelty in Science and Art
- Don't know where to start? 6 Tips on identifying research gaps
- Identifying Research Gaps to Pursue Innovative Research
- A Framework for Rigorously Identifying Research Gaps in Qualitative Literature Reviews
- Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators